Re: [AD] Re: linux compile fix |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Re: linux compile fix
- From: Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:30:43 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z3+s2PRi+OfSm1DnP484CSQ72WwI23UOVXf3kpEb8If5ub6ULkJ4MufQzP5gq7Yarj3bo7uXFpl6udzXaalZiWGVUcu258XvKmsKsDy/0Sa8ova01kl0LfA5TovmoyJcHV9Qi0CBFKPUaDFLAWa8zvtJHB2xC4mN7PWy/nhNT5k=
Elias Pschernig wrote:
So the patch shouldn't get applied?
Should not! I found later it causes a strange compile error with
--enable-linux=yes:
In file included from ./src/i386/icsprite.c:30:
/usr/include/stdio.h:281: error: syntax error before
"_IO_cookie_io_functions_t"
(In any case, I'll leave it to someone else to deal with this, since I
don't know much about the console stuff. Or, is there a simple test-case
somewhere which shows the problem?)
$ ./configure --enable-linux=no
$ make
... will fail.
It's not much about console. Is there a way to figure out whether we are
building on linux? ALLEGRO_LINUX is not it. Any non-existent autoconf
experts around? :-)
--
Milan Mimica
http://sparklet.sf.net