| Re: [AD] Re: Build Errors on Mac OSX (x86) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Re: Build Errors on Mac OSX (x86)
- From: "Miguel A. Gavidia" <juvinious@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:04:30 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=sigvCwuBYTvarNBYMJN4GSVZOe9yzYj3ruEoB6Yr2TFTafioJAHoCaWD4xlTsh8GSAjem93cwF8K70XX9d/2XYyf4+/a6P9EQgCidqlhHGNo8LBSfmeQ7Nrq+otAyxvlKuh44eNKQJIqKtcP5r4NVavjmU05oy7Ye2B4+hHiIUY=
On Saturday 25 March 2006 18:00, Peter Hull wrote:
> It should, but I'd like to be sure.
>
> A bit more background about what I'm thinking:
> There are 2 options now possible for Intel Macs - a pure C build or a
> mixed C/asm one. I'm going for the former as I think it will be the
> easiest to get up and running.
>
> To get the mixed one to work, we would have to add the src/i386 stuff
> to makefile.osx, undefine ALLEGRO_USE_C, and define ALLEGRO_I386. This
> is more complicated, especially as there seem to be some differences
> in the assembly dialect (that .balign stuff mentioned above). I'd rather go
> for a pure C build.
The .balign stuff was addressed by somebody else earlier.
basically:
.balign 4, 0x90 => .p2align 2, 0x90
So I changed them to that and got no errors.
Also just got it compiled thanks to peter. There was another
#define ALLEGRO_I386 in another file.
I'll work with it for a while and report anything else later on.
Also, I agree with peter that a pure C build would be better off.... I was
under the general impression that most if not all the asm was being dropped
eventually.
>
> Pete
>
> On 25/03/06, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Nope still getting them as undefined after removing that line.
> > > > This is with and without ALLEGRO_USE_C=1
> > > > There are several files that use these two items. :-/
> > >
> > > Did you do a make clean first?
> >
> > Shouldn't make depend be enough?
> >
> > Evert
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> > language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the
> > live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new
> > coding territory!
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 --
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
--
-juvinious
<a href="http://chasm.hopto.org";>The Chasm</a> - My Site.