| Re: [AD] Indexed datafiles |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Indexed datafiles
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:31:18 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kfJIPLQZiSFqBcoydaNoKVx1Skub7ZyeGbpqmfRQBMkRWSJnpcw58aNhfzO/Y+aSsqF5nnK8C+i/1h236KP6tjMhzHGF3U9srSOwhlmpNxQzx/pJ1RLV98jBXmSQcAyLHBRnhf7Sn0XtG/Rw1Uuql9hvOwD2YIDFH5kMLdpqvBQ=
On Friday 30 December 2005 18:32, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:55 +1100, Peter Wang wrote:
> > > > Stick to pre-C99 C.
> > >
> > > Also in 4.3? I thought we agreed on allowing C99 there some time ago..
> >
> > Did we? I don't think we should break compatibility with pre-C99
> > compilers unnecessarily.
>
> So you want to keep MSVC 6 and gcc 2.95 compatibility? I think that's
> just making life painful for ourselves, and we should use C99 where it
> makes sense, in 4.3.
Unfortuneatly none of the MSVC versions will support C99.
> > Besides, we should minimise the differences
> > between 4.2 and 4.3 where possible.
>
> I agree. But with more and more parts getting a new API soon
> (hopefully), that will be less and less of an issue.
>
> --
> Elias Pschernig
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx