| Re: [AD] AllegroGL for 4.2.0 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] AllegroGL for 4.2.0
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:49:34 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=N1Vt4ua+Wa2QRcDkLeeaUUCh0AB6s1VVkxIsSXptyTvAxOfFY3KKhJoZRL13iJAWUhxMWK0tpdYXAXJAr7C1/xiZhJt+1O4SBXO8J2/KOUI3vpbXFs/79LX2FcNy6grurD0qk10r3vqaJdZJHfSfX+LTnfp69j0PaZ+aDYTzLz4=
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 05:25, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> There seem to be several binary versions available,
> but in #allegro I heared, there are problems with font conversion or
> something..
Yes. According to Bob, the true-color fonts completely break in AllegroGL (at
least when converting them; dunno if unconverted fonts are a problem). I'm
not sure what else there is, though.