Re: [AD] namespace conflict with curses |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2005-08-17, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 23:18, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > But really, it will be done, just not for 4.2.
>
> And with that, Thomas hit the nail on the head: BITMAP will be AL_BITMAP in
> 4.3 (except in the compatibility layer, of course) and not before.
Note that BITMAP and AL_BITMAP may not have to be the same type eventually.
> I think we should follow the same policy when it comes to hline() and
> vline() at this stage in 4.2 development, even if that is less easy to
> hack around.
Do you mean you don't want to fix the hline/vline conflict for 4.2?
Unlike the case with BITMAP the hline/vline conflict causes problems at
the linker level. The third option I listed is rather simple, too.
Peter