[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Intel C++ 8.1
- From: guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:47:39 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QgTgAfry/lnyc5aniTOAwWbNQhn1OkEKJVlttldWOfcn3r6Cf1ck/SaEoaPySOm8T2AItpyCc5eKSshvenBnzITTF0uHDKcFczNO0SHiSoMI+owNlTKRbPZjPJYz9dKAxgDV8F9Tc65VSmcwahS00fxOzstqwv0/H3YnpClnhU0=
Hi,
the ICC on Windows is more like MSVC. On Linux, it is more like gcc...
There are some minor diferences in CMD line options ... it shouldn't
be difficult to port it. But the fact remains that on Windows, it
works just like MSVC port does: gcc for ASMs, icl for the rest.
Currently this port shall be open for Windows. I have problems
installing the compiler on Linux. When I do, i'll add the reqd.
makefile ..
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:04:52 +0100, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I was thinking of giving out a makefile for this compiler. Actually,
> > icc is very compatible with vc. So, there will actually be very few
> > changes required to makefile.vc ..
>
> Thats good! Can icc be used to compile the Allegro DLL? How does it compare
> with plain MSVC and/or MinGW DLLs?
>
> > 1. ALLEGRO_MSVC: as such, this port is completely compatible with icc.
> > So, should there be a separate ALLEGRO_ICC? I don't really think there
> > may be a need.
>
> It's a different compiler though, so IMO there should be a seperate define
> for it. Especially if we also want to support ICC in Linux, which is
> something that has been on my personal wish-list for a while now.
>
> > 2. Should there be a separate makefile.icl or makefile.icc for
> > Windows? As such, most things ought to work with makefile.vc except
> > for some changes/clean-up ..
>
> Following the above and the logic that it's a different compiler, yes,
> there should be a seperate makefile.icc.
>
> > Just let me know about the idea.
>
> I like it! :)
>
> Evert
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&opclick
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
--
Karthik
http://guilt.bafsoft.net