[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] int vs long
- From: Miquel 'Fire' Burns <miquelfire@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:03:09 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=etsrohC12A6ULLkM0Wc68Pcp/1wyOyFTFRfmRsCLh9m1IHS37+eqrze82ZZSjCvtL+jHPGaT9xAcImdE4Yao4wVaxOh9LA1lk1Vb+Q/e3JkcsrF484X0qaK9SQOv7XiH79C6jk8MQP7HFFdveYPgyFLJx/UyaIoxNhxr91iksAE=
I was reading that int could still be 32-bit whien compiling for
64-bit on the forums, and if that means int is 32 when addressing is
64, we're still in the same boat. I think there's a type for only
addressing in C99 anyway.
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:48:26 +1100, aj <aj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 11:44 PM 6/01/2005, you wrote:
> > > Makes sense. Where do we actually need "long" at all?
> >
> >Addresses. But of course this won't work with MSVC 64-bit.
>
>
> how about using 'unsigned int' which can morph to which-ever 32|64 as
> needed.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
--
There is no sig.