Re: [AD] int vs long

Re: [AD] int vs long

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] int vs long
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:44:08 +0100

> Makes sense. Where do we actually need "long" at all?

Addresses.  But of course this won't work with MSVC 64-bit.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] int vs long
  - From: aj

References:
- [AD] int vs long
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] int vs long
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] 64bit CPU detection patch
Next by Date: Re: [AD] int vs long
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] int vs long
Next by thread: Re: [AD] int vs long

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/