Re: [AD] int vs long

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] int vs long
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:11:21 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NimrngmyloEMzh4Q34ouj83LauV8UWnzEIvQo9COjeyM3RKqGA2p6RMuLQZ3Juc/kycQTaHtcbNrDGl/yHHKnYBWiwuWPK1g++QYouG7XwLKh+GaFCXBjySdDZhjVX6+tMT3b2bOjDHEpSR/2RrxxCHllksbmSR5tRbIrnx+Szg=

Elias Pschernig wrote:

Makes sense. Where do we actually need "long" at all?

Maybe not *need*, but I think it'd be useful to keep it for fixed, andanywhere else that's better off having a large >= int number.

References:
- [AD] int vs long
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] int vs long
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+