Re: [AD] "unstable" terminology

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] "unstable" terminology
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:02:14 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FhrZxTfdBiZHvh7sDV8F1rsf1zR88mficts2sNZ4iXpeAg6f6jL/2oKMFYZEee1b9dXG6w4xMmSxPo9Y9R1TfbUZ6vXEWtoHBOMVXBDZHqz4GGvL4qpMqcfcc3AYJaIk4+vQegN2AYWciYr+r00C49mbCUN8q5jJslmjXCiLFrA=

aj wrote:

is there a nicer word...  that means the same.
what do other projects call their WIPs ?

The ones I see usually say WIP or development (note, no -al) release, ifthey bother differentiating at all.

References:
- [AD] "unstable" terminology
  - From: Matthew Leverton
- Re: [AD] "unstable" terminology
  - From: aj

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+