Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17

Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
From: "Chris La Mantia" <celamantia@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:29:47 -0500

From: "Peter Wang" <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Let me rephrase that: 4.2.x is most likely the last branch to support
> djgpp.  Don't bother pushing harder to take it out.

The DJGPP port is far more useful than the BEOS port.  I'll bet just about
any DOS application being written now uses Allegro as it's base.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in
  - From: aj

References:
- [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
  - From: Marcio Afonso Arimura Fialho
- Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
  - From: aj
- Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Re: Serious Bugs in the DJGPP port of ALLEGRO in 4.1.17

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/