| Re: [AD] Windows mouse patch |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Windows mouse patch
- From: Elias Pschernig <allefant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:48:25 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=NFfy2i8PigWZz3p2VxluEJ+mx20a4YQzTTAES80hChNXO3l2wIyMKei4lEoJC1n5hq9CbbYCmVoRcH5vdVSCzhzCRLHOVpFXjk3YnBvBe30S9XDg1DMTX14iPN0Q4eYyHJ5lf+Ld7TgzWxNP+5c3jQKxyoI0HINaTF0quAkjFMM=
Hum. I'm in windows right now (and your OS cursor patch works nicely
:) - but the 4.1.16 mouse moves much more like the windows mouse than
the one with this patch. Did anyone else try it? With current CVS, the
mouse is very hard to move, e.g. in the test program in the splines
test I barely can grab the boxes, and in scrabber i scroll immediately
all the way up/down with the demo.dat.
I didn't pay much attention to this patch originally.. and I won't use
the windows port of Allegro - but what was the idea behind it? Maybe
the speed must be related to some setting in the windows registry, or
the screen resolution. I'd suggest to make the old one at least the
default setting, from the tests I just did.