| Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On November 30, 2004 04:10 am, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > Some of the _tx formating is getting to me >:E
> > o unterminated <li>s (makes it more difficult to properly parse)
> > o those funky <endblock> tags should go. whos idea was that anyway? Just
> > use the opener tag name ::)
>
> Well, keep the last parsed element somewhere. Close it when you
> encounter <endblock>. But I agree, <endblock> isn't pretty, also when
> having to write new docs.
>
> > the <b> dt lists... going to be interesting to know what to do there.
> > Maybe just edit the docs to use deffinition lists instead? something.
>
> Yep. For now, I'd say, just ignore <b>. The XML doesn't have to be
> perfect, we will need to improve/fix the _tx format in any case.
>
> > Why are the @chapter and @section commands multi line? Should probably be
> > changed to work like the @hnode command. easier to parse as well.
>
> Hm, I think that should be possible by the parser. Use something
> similiar to <codeblock>...<endblock>, just the start tag is
> @section<EOL>, and the end-tag is <EOL>. I think you need to add
> state-awareness to the parser (even if that is almost too complicated
> for such a simple format, it is just almost. I spent enough time
> trying to improve makedoc to figure out how evil the current _tx is
>
> :P)
No worries, it all works, but it adds a fair bit of code to the parser.
Hopefully there isnt too much more of this kind of thing.
Just gotta fix my <li> closing code ;) it was working, till I fixed another
problem... heh.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net