| Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On November 30, 2004 02:32 am, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On November 28, 2004 01:42 pm, Stepan Roh wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > > One of the things making the current makedoc so complicated is that it
> > > has to deal with all the output specifics while reading in the ._tx
> > > file (instead of leaving it to the output generators). And I don't see
> > > how the docs have any advantage from it.
> >
> > Header and footer can go, but front-page with big Allegro ASCII-logo and
> > std_disclaimer should stay.
>
> Actually, my ._tx->.xml doesn't need a front-page tag. just put some
> <para>s for that text right in the first section/chapter.
>
Some of the _tx formating is getting to me >:E
o unterminated <li>s (makes it more difficult to properly parse)
o those funky <endblock> tags should go. whos idea was that anyway? Just use
the opener tag name ::)
the <b> dt lists... going to be interesting to know what to do there. Maybe
just edit the docs to use deffinition lists instead? something.
Why are the @chapter and @section commands multi line? Should probably be
changed to work like the @hnode command. easier to parse as well.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net