Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
From: Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 23:17:03 +0200

Robert Ohannessian wrote:

I think the reason was that the examples get built before Allegro is
installed, so the compiler may not find allegro.h if you use <>.


that makes no sense since the header files are not in the examples directory

--
Regards,
    Michal

References:
- RE: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Robert Ohannessian

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Next by Date: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Next by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/