Re: [AD] Regarding backwards compatibility of 4.1.x and 4.x where x >= 2 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 00:04, Chris wrote:
> AFAIK, "deprecated" means no longer supported. However, I have argued
> for removing those warnings in the past because the deprecation warning
> GCC generates /will/ cause compilation to fail if the programmer uses
> -Werror (which is good practice durring development, IMO). And saying
> that the programmer doesn't have to switch to the new API (immediately)
> is contradictory to that.
-Wno-deprecated-declarations gets rid of those warnings/errors. Finding
where you use deprecated functions becomes very hard if the compiler
doesn't spit out a warning for you. I'd prefer to keep the current
warnings, but maybe point out the -Wno-deprecated-declarations a little
more clearly in the docs.
Evert