Re: [AD] Regarding backwards compatibility of 4.1.x and 4.x where x >= 2

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Tuesday 14 September 2004 00:04, Chris wrote:
> AFAIK, "deprecated" means no longer supported. However, I have argued 
> for removing those warnings in the past because the deprecation warning 
> GCC generates /will/ cause compilation to fail if the programmer uses 
> -Werror (which is good practice durring development, IMO). And saying 
> that the programmer doesn't have to switch to the new API (immediately) 
> is contradictory to that.

-Wno-deprecated-declarations gets rid of those warnings/errors. Finding 
where you use deprecated functions becomes very hard if the compiler 
doesn't spit out a warning for you. I'd prefer to keep the current 
warnings, but maybe point out the -Wno-deprecated-declarations a little 
more clearly in the docs.

Evert





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/