[AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?

[AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro developers mailing list <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz <gradha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:12:45 +0100

I'm thinking of those fancy OSes where a pop up dialog with
Unicode text can be popped.  For non unicode console platforms
allegro_umessage could pass the task to allegro_message
anyway. Unicode aware consoles could show the full range of
characters.

Is this feature desired by somebody?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
  - From: Chris

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Bug in 4.1.15's DirectAMX changes
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Fwd: Allegro fullscreen under Xwindow
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Fwd: Allegro fullscreen under Xwindow
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/