Re: [AD] X11 unresponsiveness

[Chris <kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Elias Pschernig wrote:
> I call the handler already when the lock
> count is still 1, so if another signal happens at that time, it does the
> right thing. With that, I think, it is safe to commit.

Oh, ok. I see. Yeah, that should be safe. However, I still don't like 
globalizing an _xwin_private* function, and it just screams /* HACK: */. 
I think the best thing to do is to leave the input handler alone (sans 
the multi-threaded patch), and just have the *_needs_poll functions 
return true for the signal version of the library. Allegro has enough 
hacks as it is, and I don't think we need to add more when we already 
have the means to fix it simply by changing a return value.

- Kitty Cat