Re: [AD] Why I was talking about dropping ABI in WIP versions

[guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

The issue was spcifically to remove the ABI section off WIP releases
only :D not the stable ones

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:08:22 +0200, Eric Botcazou
<ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "Once Allegro 4.2 is released, we plan to maintain backward
> > compatibility...  the dynamically linked library"
> 
> Please quote the entire sentence, which is: " Once Allegro 4.2 is released,
> we plan to maintain backward compatibility at the Application Binary
> Interface level for the subsequent releases of the 4.2.x series."
> 
> > Well, in 4.1.x there were many changes that were made... and the
> > problem was that because the documentation meant that the newer
> > versions of the library could be compatible on the older DLLs for
> > example. Consider the functions which got deprecated. Did they get
> > exported too?
> 
> I fail to see where is the contradiction.
> 
> --
> Eric Botcazou
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
> digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
> unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
> 


-- 
V Karthik Kumar