[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Peter Wang wrote:
Anyway, the goal is to call the callbacks at an average rate of 100
times per second.
Shouldn't the code just call it as fast as possible while still giving
away the cpu after every iteration of the timers? Granted a method like
that on most system will result in a rate of ~100 times per second, but
it also seems that some linux kernels have the option to change the
speed of the kernel timer frequency, so it may be possible to get more
if it effects the scheduler as well (though I haven't tested this).
- Kitty Cat