Re: [AD] Sound system

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Yes, it's what I meant. But since we wanted to release 4.2 "soon", then I figured that there will probably be just one more WIP before the final release. Thus, 4.3 is a better target for those mixer patches.


Hein Zelle wrote:

Robert Jr Ohannessian wrote:


I think we should wait for 4.2 before removing the DX mixer. That's a change that affects quite a lot of users, so this should definitely be done in a WIP. We need to make sure all the details are ironed out.


Huh? Doesn't that mean we should do the change some time _before_ the
4.2 release so it actually gets tested in WIP releases, and the change
doesn't occur halfway the stable 4.2 branch? I think it should be done
either in the 4.1 or in the 4.3 series, and since 4.4 (or 5.0) is
probably a long way ahead, why not do it in 4.1? It may take a couple
of extra WIP releases for things to be ironed out, but I don't think
that will hurt much.

Unless of course that's what you meant in the first place, in which
case you can ignore this mail.

     Hein Zelle


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<

Unix is user friendly. It's just very particular about who it's friends are.

 Hein Zelle                     hein@xxxxxxxxxx
	                        http://www.icce.rug.nl/~hein

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/