Re: [AD] Allegro PDF documentation

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


At 09:58 PM 28/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 21:39, aj wrote:
> At 09:00 PM 28/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> >On 2003-12-28, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello Grzegorz,
> > >
> > > What about mentioning on api.html that a PDF version of the docs
> > > can now be generated and uploading it on the server like the
> > > CHM version?
> >
> >There are two ways to do a pdf version, through the make target or
> >creating the html version and then use an html to pdf tool. Which
> >should be used?
>
>
> none,  why would you want PDF docs when you have HTML ?
>

printing? (and don't ask: why would you want to print anything?)


and HTML and txt  aren't printable enough ?

im not against PDF; i think adding unnecessary stuff leads to bloat that just needs to be maintained, without adding any real value.
what value does this PDF format offer that the other formats dont ?








Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/