[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> curious... what is the problem?
I don't want to add more cruft to the configure machinery.
> linking against libstdc++ (++ :-) just to support new and delete operators
> is somewhat overkill i agree, but how many bytes of crap gets linked in
> exactly? i think you should avoid overloading the new and delete operators
> if the overhead from the extra linked objects (!) is small, which i think
> is the case.
Yes, this is surely not a recommended practice. But the test is meant to
exercise the Allegro library in the context of C++, not the opposite.
--
Eric Botcazou