Re: [AD] c++ test.

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

> curious... what is the problem?

I don't want to add more cruft to the configure machinery.

> linking against libstdc++ (++ :-) just to support new and delete operators
> is somewhat overkill i agree, but how many bytes of crap gets linked in
> exactly? i think you should avoid overloading the new and delete operators
> if the overhead from the extra linked objects (!) is small, which i think 
> is the case.

Yes, this is surely not a recommended practice. But the test is meant to 
exercise the Allegro library in the context of C++, not the opposite.

Eric Botcazou

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+