RE: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object

[Vincent Penquerc'h <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object

> No, current CVS mainline code. And it's the same for the
> 4.1.9 release.

Hmm, OK. I'll have to check my tree.

> Yes, ints are 32-bit for GCC on x86-64 while longs are 64-bit
> (LP64 model).
> I suppose this was a conservative decision made to avoid a x2
> increase in
> memory footprint for every application on Earth.

OK. But then casting unsigned long to int also loses bits. So why
doesn't it complain here ? Because the two types are ints, so it
decides not to ?

--
Vincent Penquerc'h