Re: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object

Re: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 12:15:31 +0200

> OK. But then casting unsigned long to int also loses bits. So why
> doesn't it complain here ? Because the two types are ints, so it
> decides not to ?

Yes.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- RE: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: RE: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object
Next by Date: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
Previous by thread: RE: [AD] grabber patch to replace an object
Next by thread: [AD] Simple fix for the WinXP black screen bug

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/