[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:00:38PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > and asks what file it should patch.
>
> Just to be sure: you're in the allegro directory, aren't you ?
Ah! I was one directory above the Allegro directory, which IIRC is ok for
the in-between patches. I tried again from the Allegro directory and get
the following:
eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx: ~/Program/allegro-cvs/allegro>patch -p1 < allegro-4.0.3-backport.diff
Looks like a unified context diff.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R [yes]
Apply anyway? [no] yes
Hunk #2 failed at line 207.
Hunk #3 failed at line 380.
Hunk #4 failed at line 53.
Hunk #5 failed at line 61.
Hunk #6 failed at line 72.
etc. Maybe I should have answered differently to one of those questions, but
saying `no' to either resulted in all the patches being rejected.
> > Maybe it's Solaris's patch version, I don't know, but any help would be
> > appreciated :-)
>
> Is it GNU patch, or... ?
I think it's SUN patch - at least it doesn't say it's GNU anywhere. The manual
pages are dated 1995, which may not be an accurate indication of the age of
the installed version.
Hmm... I may try to hijack a Linux box and try to apply the patch there (for
some reason, the box refuses an ssh connection, so I actually need to be
sitting at it to use it).
Evert