Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?] |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2002-11-17, Grzegorz <gradha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:10:32AM +1100, Peter Wang wrote:
> > > Erasing that silly div css section is also a good option.
> >
> > Or we can leave it in for people who to customise the look. The
> > default CSS file would not have a green background, of course :-)
>
> Sure, this patch will then taste better.
I already had made the appropriate changes in my local copy, which are
now committed. In the end I decided that the code to allow the retval
section wasn't nice... so just removed it. Sorry for wasting your time.
--
王浩禎
- References:
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
- From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz