Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]

Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:02:37 +1100

On 2002-11-07, Grzegorz <gradha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>                                  The big problem is the current
> documentation, many texts don't fit nicely with this "return"
> block at the end and will have to be rewritten.

We had a volunteer, didn't we? ;-)

-- 
王浩禎

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz

References:
- [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] configure script: feature or bug ?
Next by Date: Re: [AD] configure script: feature or bug ?
Previous by thread: Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]
Next by thread: Re: [aj@xxxxxxxxxx: RE: [AD] [AL] docs, return values?]

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/