Re: [AD] configure script: feature or bug ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2002-11-08, Eric <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently we have a mix between checks that are silenced when disabled (all
> the AC_CHECK_HEADERs, the X Window sub-checks) and checks that are failed
> (the asm related checks). For the sake of consistency and simplicity, I think
> we should silence everything.
Silencing requires an "if" statement around the check anyway, doesn't
it? In that case I'd prefer to see an explicit message saying that the
feature was disabled. It doesn't matter to me if the message doesn't
look like a "genuine" autoconf message (although it probably matters to
you :-)
--
王浩禎