| Re: [AD] RE: [AD] RE: [AD] doc patch to mention the right include files |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 10:31, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
[snip]
> or want to spam
> your global namespace or not ;)
But if Allegro defines a symbol called, eg., 'clear', then won't that
symbol still conflict at the linking stage with other 'clear' symbols,
even if it is not declared? If that is the case, then I don't see the
point in separate headers (although my machine is a fast one).
Bye for now,
- --
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
(GnuPG 04A646EA) http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9bLNOUdhclgSmRuoRAnA4AJ4zuiWEb4O5b4vp+fo1M2Ry9wW/TACfdzzC
pO30370NbB6XTcxp6uBy7Tw=
=Vlfl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----