Re: [AD] PALETTE and RGB* (part 2)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 2002-08-07, Eric <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, now, we're talking about 4.2 (possibly 4.0) so we don't want to
> > break anything.
> 
> I don't think we should modify the 4.0 API to this extent at this point.
> 
> > So I'm tentatively changing my proposal to make all functions
> > consistently use "RGB *" syntax instead of "PALETTE".  How's that?
> 
> The cleanest method I think.

I'm dropping this proposal too, as I don't really like it.  It's not
_technically_ necessary anyway.  Sorry for wasting time.

-- 
王浩禎



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/