Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch
From: Daniel Schlyder <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 02:58:21 +0200
Invalid-uucp-from: From daniel@xxxxxxxxxx Fri Jul 26 11:50:41 2002

> Why is it necessary?  C preprocessors won't complain if you include the
> same header multiple times.

It's not, but isn't it sort of a standard? And won't the preprocessor waste
time re-processing the same file for every time it's included otherwise?

-- 
Sincerely,
Daniel Schlyder

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] About my load_sample patch
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Low-level file hooks - implemented and tested
Previous by thread: Re[2]: [AD] dat tool save header patch
Next by thread: Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/