Re: [AD] sincos

["Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Your suggestion was good, it could go on top, IIRC it was some
> additional clipping (I didn't know that such clipping was already
> done, or something like this (fuzzy memory)).

Yes, I suggested some sort of "hard clipping" to avoid bogus clipping
values. I think we could give it a try.

> I don't know. Probably not, since it's done by storing a property
> in the grabber specific object, and it should work as ir did
> before when it is not found. I've been using it for quite a while
> now.

Peter, what do you think about that ?

> What was it ?
> Looks like object_message to me, but I can't remember what it was.

Out-of-line-ization of object_message().

> Do you still have all of these, or shall I send some (except om.diff
> which I don't have) ?

I've attached the patch I commited.

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: object_message.diff
Description: Binary data