RE: [AD] sincos

["Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: [AD] sincos

> > - sub bitmap original fix
>
> I just read again the thread. Damn! it's technical... ;-)
> I still think your original solution is not safe enough but
> I'm ok to change
> the current behaviour for 4.2 (it's even on the todo list).

Your suggestion was good, it could go on top, IIRC it was some
additional clipping (I didn't know that such clipping was already
done, or something like this (fuzzy memory)).

> > - grabber sorting option
>
> There is a related feature request on SF's tracker for a long time and
> Peter ruled against it because of backward compatibility.
> IIRC your patch
> breaks it too, doesn't it ?

I don't know. Probably not, since it's done by storing a property
in the grabber specific object, and it should work as ir did
before when it is not found. I've been using it for quite a while
now.

> It looks like I missed another patch (om.diff) that I agreed on in a
> previous message... I'm going to apply it.

What was it ?
Looks like object_message to me, but I can't remember what it was.
I don't have it.
Do you still have all of these, or shall I send some (except om.diff
which I don't have) ?

--
Vincent Penquerc'h