RE: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

["Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

> This simply allows easy nesting. For example, acquire_bitmap()/
> release_bitmap() involves locking a mutex under Windows for non-memory
> bitmaps, and drawing primitives automatically call the
> function pairs. Now

OK, makes sense. I've always used counters for that, but then
I've never used threads myself, so I've just seen the relevance :)
Cheers

--
Vincent Penquerc'h