Re: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 12 Dec 2001 at 22:07, Hein Zelle wrote:
> I believe the latter part would solve lots. If we could devise a
> system of add-ons (preferably with an official add-on for each piece of
> functionality) with an download system (website, whatever) that enables
> you to pick and download all your add-ons, we'd be a lot further. No
> more searching: everything is in 1 place with one official addon for
> each problem. One make system: simply install the package in the source
> tree and run make, or unzip it for binaries like djgpp does.

See the problem I was seeing with this is that the modules idea 
breaks apart every sense of ABI compatability we have been striving 
for between DLLs and in that system every Allegro DLL is different 
(unless each module is a DLL, then how many DLLs will there be?  Will it
just be DLL-hell?).

I think we finally got ABI compatability with Allegro 4 right?  Does that
mean ming and MSVC can share DLLs now?

Gillius



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/