Re: [AD] Release Candidate 3 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
[It looks like another message was eaten by the server]
> http://alleg.sf.net/future/rc3/all400.zip
Compiled and tested under DJGPP, MinGW32 and Borland C++ (6 more
compilations, I'm probably around 20 compilations since RC1 :-)
> I forgot about these warnings when making RC3.
Not very important anyway.
> ** Now: [my versions of] djgpp sort and Linux sort behave differently
> with regards to underscores in the start of a symbol.
Damn ! You're right, although both are GNU sort 2.0 on my machine.
It seems that the Linux version strips the underscores, as though it was
aliased as 'sort -d'. IMHO that's ugly. I tried to play with the LC_COLLATE
and LC_CTYPE variables, but didn't find anything.
Could everyone who has another version or another platform do a test ?
Simply 'sort' the attached file (in French :-).
Here are my results:
DJGPP sort 2.0:
_bonjour
beau
bonjour
brusque
Linux sort 2.0:
beau
_bonjour
bonjour
brusque
> The dllsyms.lst file generated also seems to be a lot different to the
> previous one.
To that of RC2 ? No, they are strictly identical.
To that of 3.9.40 WIP, yes because Henrik probably used the right version of
sort.
> Finally, I found out yesterday that the new Unix makefile doesn't work
> with BSD make. It doesn't understand the doc building patterns. I
> don't know how to fix that.
Could you post the error ? Where can one get a binary version of BSD make
for Linux glibc 2.2 ?
--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx
bonjour
_bonjour
beau
brusque