[AD] Allegro 3.9.39 SIGSEGV with DJGPP

["Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I just downloaded 3.9.39 and it still failed, but if I "set DEBUGMODE=1"
before make, after make clean of course then Allegro works.

Any ideas?

As a side issue 3.9.39 is not available from
http://www.talula.demon.co.uk/allegro/wip.on.html . Is there a reason for
this?

By the way Allegro graphics are okay on Windows XP. I am using an Nvidia MX
(original MX) with 21.83 Win 2K/XP driver.

 Andrew

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 9:40 PM
> Subject: Allegro 3.9.38 SIGSEGV with DJGPP
>
>
> >
> > On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 11:13:48 GMT, in comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > harald.jeszenszky@xxxxxxxxxx (Harald Jeszenszky) wrote:
> >
> > >Thank you for your response. After downloading the latest version from
> > >the ALLEGRO homepage I tried to compile the library again. After a
> > >while the compilation stops with a new error message:
> > >
> > >D:\djgpp\ALLEGRO>make
> > >Compiling Allegro for djgpp, optimised. Please wait...
> > >tools/dat2s.exe -p setup -o obj/djgpp/setupdat.s setup/setup.dat
> > >Exiting due to signal SIGSEGV
> > >General Protection Fault at eip=000221de
> > >eax=0824548b ebx=00000000 ecx=00158c5c edx=00000000 esi=90c35d5e
> > >edi=00000000
> > >ebp=00042060 esp=001575d8 program=tools/dat2s.exe
> > >cs: sel=020f  base=02860000  limit=0015ffff
> > >ds: sel=0217  base=02860000  limit=0015ffff
> > >es: sel=0217  base=02860000  limit=0015ffff
> > >fs: sel=01e7  base=00010290  limit=0000ffff
> > >gs: sel=021f  base=00000000  limit=0010ffff
> > >ss: sel=0217  base=02860000  limit=0015ffff
> > >App stack: [00158108..000d8108]  Exceptn stack: [000d8060..000d6120]
> > >
> > >Call frame traceback EIPs:
> >
> > I also get the same problem when using GCC 3.02 and DJGPP 2.04 alpha for
> Win
> > 2K / XP. I can build TVision and Seteditor and they work so the CPP and
C
> > programs build and run fine.
> >
> > Has anyone fixed this problem yet?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
>