Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
From: Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:02:40 +0000

In reply to Bob <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>2) The migration from 5.0 to 6.0 will (most probably) break the whole API, with 
>things like a fixed source/dest order of variables, and other stuff mentioned in 
>other posts.

Sorry, I'm a little unclear -- was Martijn's proposal that we keep
*everything* the same between 4.0 and 5.0 save the names themselves? Or
do we change those things in the API we don't like between 4.0 and 5.0?

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Thomas Fjellstrom
- Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Bob

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] to prefix or not to prefix (part 2)
Next by Date: RE: [AD] to prefix or not to prefix (part 2)
Previous by thread: RE: [AD] to prefix or not to prefix (part 2)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/