RE: [AD] Five patches

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [AD] Five patches
From: "Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:31:54 -0000

Title: RE: [AD] Five patches

> > I even wonder if we shouldn't make it an internal function (exported
> > though because some utilities like exedat.c may want to use it),
> > namely _pack_fdopen().
>
> I'm going to do that if no one disagrees.

Seems fine to me.
This may generate another wave of discussion on this topic, but ... :)
How about beginning to prefix new API entries ?
eg: _al_pack_fdopen() ?

--
Vincent Penquerc'h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Five patches
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] problems compiling Allegro CVS with gcc 3.0.2
Next by Date: [AD] Header splitup.
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Five patches
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Five patches

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/