RE: [AD] Five patches

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Title: RE: [AD] Five patches

> > I even wonder if we shouldn't make it an internal function (exported
> > though because some utilities like exedat.c may want to use it),
> > namely _pack_fdopen().
>
> I'm going to do that if no one disagrees.

Seems fine to me.
This may generate another wave of discussion on this topic, but ... :)
How about beginning to prefix new API entries ?
eg: _al_pack_fdopen() ?

--
Vincent Penquerc'h



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/