| Re: [AD] Color convertors |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> I thought about the possibility of using such a method when all this thing
> started; well, I came to the conclusion the 256 bytes LUT method is faster
> in most cases.
You're probably right: the vast majority of programs will run faster with
the current solution.
> Ok, I've updated the BeOS code too to reflect the changes. Later, when all
> the conversion routines will be ready, I'll test everything to assure
> there are no probs. Then, finally and hopefully we'll be ready to release
> WIP 3.9.38... =)
Yes, the code needs testing before the WIP on BeOS and Windows and I think
we should postpone any modifications other than bugfixes. I would also like
to add a working support for 8-bit desktops on Windows (currently the
Windows driver doesn't fill the colormap so the color are a little bit
screwed up).
> PS: on colconv.c, line 209 there is currently a "return;", but shouldn't
> it be a "break;"?
Damn !
The only convertor I didn't test...
---
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx