Re: [AD] namespace collision

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] namespace collision
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:59:34 +1000

On 10 Aug 2001, Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The only concern I have is whether other compilers support the idea
> of "extern inline", whether using those exact keywords or others.

Of course, we can fallback to "static inline" on compilers that
don't support it.  So that's not a problem.

If the compiler doesn't support "inline" (MPW?), then we're in big
trouble.

References:
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Sven Sandberg
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Sven Sandberg
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] namespace collision
Next by Date: Re: [AD] namespace collision
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] namespace collision
Next by thread: Re: [AD] namespace collision

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/