Re: [AD] Very small patch for black_rgb initialisation

Re: [AD] Very small patch for black_rgb initialisation

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Very small patch for black_rgb initialisation
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:23:49 +0200

> Really? I have gcc 2.95.3 DJGPP and I was getting a warning. Although I
> was using WARNMODE=1, which might explain the difference?

Probably.
Same thing under the old gcc 2.91.66 (aka egcs 1.1.2).
And I was wrong: it's gcc 2.95.2-3 for Mingw32, not 2.95.3 !

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [AD] Very small patch for black_rgb initialisation
  - From: Laurence Withers

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] Patch to add constructor stuff to load_bitmap, save_bitmap
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Patch to add constructor stuff to load_bitmap, save_bitmap
Previous by thread: [AD] Very small patch for black_rgb initialisation
Next by thread: [AD] Patch to add constructor stuff to load_bitmap, save_bitmap

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/