| Re: [AD] Documentation update patch (`const') |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In reply to Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >Committed. `const._tx' is still around for the time being, as it still
> >seems useful to me (after all, the API has changed from 3.1). Or is it
> >horribly out of date and incorrect?
>
> It's slightly out of date, but I suppose it does mention some useful
> points. Perhaps it needs a minor revision?
Yes, I think so. It's a bit of an API change, and I don't think we
should assume that people have been following the WIPs. OTOH, users
shouldn't feel the difference at all, especially after all the
consts are removed from BITMAP pointers (ick!).