RE: [AD] yet another windows diff |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> Did anybody get around to testing this? I seem to remember
> Shawn saying this wouldn't work. Maybe the difficult bit is
> guessing name mangling, in which case your function pointers
> will work better, or maybe it's calling conventions? I don't
> really know. I want to apply the rest of this patch for the new
> WIP, but can't unless this works universally. Maybe until this
> is tested, Isaac, I could apply all of the rest of the patch --
> or does it depend upon the wddlock.c->asmlock.s change?
I tested it on my machine, and it works perfectly. Shawn didn't say anything
about this wouldn't work (as far as I remember), but if it has any problem (in
other computers), I would fix it