| Re: [translations] Moving translation branch to 2.17 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] Moving translation branch to 2.17
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:56:59 +0100
- Cc: translations@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QbXj43TlJVGaTHyUA9DCUzkAXIXwR96Cv/E/BdtqdLE=; b=B56ttLg5TOMGDMgU0RhAGw2s4fDo1xwntqz1KChcglZen4M9gcDjAufzyzh9P57O3s 9byrtQ9+hEijOm7CvpsE0Mjay5KLm6ZWVFeirjiXroSAz24ZLzm+3aNRK7DHEaGo5Ctg dtiDC9y1JoKktda2HlZDQkCTtMb2IJ3wUmVUTCnhu4DWk3gsJqiIwHf7xpraRYqpzDrZ JgA6hbpVBdhrAW8s0Z2u+jV+IuQ2zfccZr8gsYXI2RJhtVfMkmTO8fDicVzQYcmg3zrM Ga1dY74RRFntB9W/kvp8ufee6EA/H6W3iehidJ4aZBbVLRaIreF1i0PO59TK4rloAFbX 8H2g==
2012/11/29 David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there any objection of moving the translation branch over to 2.17? I
> think it is about time: syntax and documentation of 2.17 have by now
> diverged from stable to a degree where significant parts can't be moved
> between 2.16 and 2.17, and the translations should focus on getting this
> new work out to non-English speakers as well.
>
> I also noticed that in the statistics of commits, translations have
> dropped precariously (previously Francisco being more or less tieing
> with me regarding numbers of commits, mostly due to translation merges).
> So it appears that further staying with 2.16 would block a significant
> part of work on LilyPond.
Definitely. I speak for myself: I can not work on translations unless
we are on 2.17. So, I have been waiting this moment to arrive.
Thanks
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com