| [translations] Re: x-ref intranslated docs |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
Le 05/01/2011 03:59, Graham Percival disait :
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
unnumbered sectioning. I then translated input.itely (part of
notation), where there is a link to a node which is an
unmberedsubsec in running (Invoking lilypond).
Unnumbered sectioning is nothing new; we use it all the time in
Notation.
As long as you link to the same manual, there is no problem.
I believe the problem is an @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node
in front of it; this is forbidden by our doc policy. This does not
appear in the english version of running.itely, but I *do* see one of
these in the french version of running.itely.
Sorry to contradict you:
there is *no* @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node in front of it
in the French version of running.itely, otherwise the link wouldn't even
exist neither be effective in notation-big-page.fr.html as I just
checked on a fresh build.
The only sectionning that appears without a @node _also in English_ is
"@unnumberedsubsubsec Standard shell commands".
Cheers,
Jean-Charles