Re: [translations] problems with check-translation |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] problems with check-translation
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:43:57 +0200
- Cc: Jean-Charles Malahieude <lilyfan@xxxxxxxxx>, Translations list at lilynet <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L3jMoprKzzn0k1PS/t3/SVavHL2Gqn4ZNWT2rBQ7SRM=; b=NkRj3t5y4X1FcPYFd0keqKJwkA64R1sKnTy8UDGQT24ze2+uaiWdNpXKitp6HuJ9Fq 1nywIQVNpTDOP9TMH/8Wwsde/T/QstbmNJbbwgPdYTgBNV7RRY7ASOpsMfzzCkvUOjzA jfilOGjXSU0oAJpngfHx44YSbA1KiILq/hFU0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PLakBkJR8CGuNacY6FM8wiJAVv/py3ZoYF8AoVjynyjVX0wPtLPiOuZSbWQNE94Zzj 7v76cIwNF//aLnses+eXnRwwyIeeNcjfEB8ofdBz+0ORK9ZQrP1Pdv9lrM8eSfnnzSHo vNAOzEDOV2BGZkgzifQNuNluaCWtVBnRt/f/4=
2010/9/26 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Il giorno dom, 26/09/2010 alle 15.58 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude ha
> scritto:
>> Just one detail: you might have to first run autogen and then make.
>> Or it might be due to something wrong with your python packages?
>
> I had run autogen, but not make.
> I thought 'make' was needed only for compilation...
These are the relevant dependencies in this case:
'make website' could need a previous 'make doc' for some images to be built.
'make doc' needs a previous 'make' if the docs need an updated version
of the program to be built. Especially regtests are a very probable
source of problems with an outdated version of the binary.
'make' could need a previous './autogen.sh' if something in the
buildscripts changed.
'./autogen.sh' is useless without a further 'make'
A working sequence could be
time ( ./autogen.sh && make && make doc )
then go for some coffee or for a walk. Watch the 'time' output and
try to learn guessing how long will it be expected to last.
> Should I worry about these warnings?
> warning: it/search-box.ihtml: fatal: bad object
> afdfd9e608370743933d8dfdaa03a682053c33c9
> warning: it/web.texi: fatal: bad object
> 6b71709c9c709643c72425cf2e958f169ccdb509
> warning: it/web/community.itexi: fatal: bad object
> afdfd9e608370743933d8dfdaa03a682053c33c9
> warning: it/web/download.itexi: fatal: bad object
> afdfd9e608370743933d8dfdaa03a682053c33c9
> warning: it/web/introduction.itexi: fatal: bad object
> afdfd9e608370743933d8dfdaa03a682053c33c9
> warning: it/web/manuals.itexi: fatal: bad object
> afdfd9e608370743933d8dfdaa03a682053c33c9
The committishes in these files could refer to non-existant commits.
This probably is due to private branches having been merged, then made
public. Don't rely too much on this, it has only 50 percent of sense,
even for myself.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com