[translations] Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lilynet.net/translations Archives ]
Le dimanche 09 août 2009 à 16:48 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > Mao. So that means that we don't want to add > git config --global branch.autosetuprebase always > to the git setup, and we still have to tell people to do > git pull -r > instead of > git pull > ? You didn't read the end of the paragraph I added in the CG. Actually, we could make this option standard (except for people who merge master and lilypond/translation), if and only if contributors are required to use committishes in the head of translated files exclusively from git.sv.gnu.org master branch. I'm thinking about adding a command (a make target, actually) to update committishes in a way that meets this requirement. > And even worse, the difference between those two commands > depends on what kind of update the contributor is working on?! Yes, except if we have the requirement explained above. As all translators eventually mess up committishes (I already did), this would be saner. Cheers, John
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |