| Re: [tablatures] Tablature Feature Request Examples - Part 2 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: David Stocker <dstocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] Tablature Feature Request Examples - Part 2
- From: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:42:11 +0100
- Cc: "tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1262720532; l=1059; s=domk; d=hohlart.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=gK2GTwPDsqHFX2GgEWlXQCOfNBg=; b=DbDfRuXcUeXJTTE1WudvoaSgZzd4eXoCrOhe8xk81atGzeT0MltwZV6vWhvtjvtLyAS U24Hz/DKxCMcJm8TvRe4/iA26P2vWHruP9m3EblH/XQubw4higUKz+vaZkwRLqFoEcyTq hozhftQzHNjgMdCpDG7itfx7O+4FHM3kDBg=
David Stocker schrieb:
Here are more examples of usage in guitar tablature.
Thanks! I think this has been a lot of work ...
I realize that some of these are complex. The reason I put down some
more complex examples is so that those doing the coding for this may
see potential problems early on and be able to leave the code
open-ended and flexible enough handle more complex scenarios in the
future. In this way, I hope that as more features are implemented, a
re-write of existing code won't be necessary in order to accommodate
them.
Yes, that's sensible.
Hats off Mark and Carl (and everyone else who is able to contribute -
now and in the future) for making this developments happen and kudos
to the entire LilyPond -devel and documentation teams for all your
efforts. I know the job can be thankless sometimes. I'm sure I speak
for the community when I say we're grateful to have this wonderful
tool at our disposal and the world of Music Typesetting is better for it.
:)
Marc
Peace,
David